G — Additional Comments/Observations
This is the open comment section at the bottom of Page 3 where the inspector provides written explanations for anything marked Unsatisfactory, any hazards or deficiencies identified, and any additional context that does not fit neatly into the checkboxes above. If a system was marked Unsatisfactory, the explanation goes here. If there are details about a partial roof replacement, the specifics of an electrical hazard, or the circumstances around a prior plumbing leak, this is where the inspector writes it out. The form notes that additional pages can be used if needed — and for inspections with multiple findings, they often are.
H — Inspector Certification
The final statement on Page 3 reinforces what was established at the top of the form on Page 1: the form must be completed and signed by a verifiable Florida-licensed inspector, and the inspector certifies that everything documented in the report is true and correct. This is not a formality. The inspector is putting their license behind the accuracy of every checkbox, every photograph, and every comment on the form. A report that contains false or misleading information puts the inspector’s license at risk and can constitute insurance fraud. This is why an experienced inspector will document what they find — even when the finding is not what the homeowner wants to hear — rather than overlook an issue to produce a cleaner report.
I — Page 4: Additional Comments or Observations Requirements
Page 4 of the form is a continuation of the comments section, but it opens with specific instructions about what must be documented if certain conditions were noted during the inspection. The form requires full details and descriptions for three categories: updates to any system (including the type of update, the date it was completed, and who performed the work), any visible hazards or deficiencies found during the inspection, and any system determined not to be in good working order.
This page exists because the comments section on Page 3 often does not provide enough space, and because the form’s authors wanted to make clear that these three categories are not optional — if any of them apply, the inspector is required to provide the details. An inspector who checks an Unsatisfactory box or a hazard checkbox on the preceding pages but provides no explanation in the comments section has submitted an incomplete form.
Observations Outside the Scope of the 4-Point Inspection
While a 4-point inspection is limited to four specific systems — roof, electrical, plumbing, and HVAC — a qualified inspector does not stop seeing when they look past those systems. If an inspector observes a hazard or significant deficiency during the course of the inspection that falls outside the defined scope of the 4-point form, professional standards and ethics codes provide for — and in some cases compel — the inspector to document it. The Florida Standards of Practice for home inspectors (Rule 61-30.801) explicitly state that the standards “shall not be construed as limiting the scope of the inspection process in those areas where the inspector is qualified and/or has special knowledge.” Licensed inspectors in the state of Florida “may disclose observed immediate safety hazards to occupants exposed to such hazards, when feasible,” and to report conditions that “affect the safety of others” even beyond the defined scope of the inspection. To not disclose an obvious deficiency or hazard would go against the code of ethics most inspectors choose to take.
This is where the Additional Comments section of the form serves a broader purpose. For example, while photographing the exterior of a home for the roof section, an inspector may notice step cracking in the block or stucco along the side of the home. Step cracks — diagonal cracks that follow the mortar joints in a stair-step pattern — are not part of a 4-point inspection. They have nothing to do with the roof, the electrical panel, the plumbing, or the HVAC system. But they can indicate differential settlement or a foundation issue, and a responsible inspector who is qualified to recognize that pattern is not going to walk past it and pretend they did not see it. That observation goes into the Additional Comments section as a noted deficiency outside the scope of the inspection, typically with a recommendation that the homeowner have it evaluated by a structural engineer or a licensed contractor qualified to assess foundation conditions. It will not affect the Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory determination on any of the four systems, but it becomes part of the documented record — and it may be the most valuable thing on the entire report.
[Return to the main “Understanding the 4-Point Inspection Form” page]